Law Offices of J. Arthur Roberts Free Case Evaluation Contact Us
Foreclosure Defense
Mortgage Law
Loan Modification
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Loans
Debt Negotiation
Credit Repair
Real Estate Transactions

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/D057005.PDF

 

A February 18, 2011 Fourth Appellate District decision upheld a San Diego trial court's decision to throw out a lawsuit alleging that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") lacked the right to foreclose under California's non-judicial foreclosure statute.  The decision, Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Recon Trust et al.  can be viewed at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/D057005.PDF. 

This decision affects situations where no assignment of the deed of trust has been filed and the foreclosure is brought in the name of MERS.  Lenders have backed off this process since 2006 and usually file an assignment and foreclose in the name of a mortgage backed security trust, not MERS. This decision may result in Robosigners changing their business practice filing more foreclosures in the name of MERS.  As pled, the lawsuit had some flaws.  To attempt to state a claim as in Ohlendorf, Gomes would have to plead that the specific party who initiated the foreclosure process was not the proper party to do so because assignments of the deed of trust were improperly backdated.  To attempt to state a claim as in Ohlendorf, Gomes would have to plead that the specific party who initiated the foreclosure process was not the proper party to do so because assignments of the deed of trust were improperly backdated. (Ohlendorf, supra, 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 31098 at *22-23.)  To conform to the theory pled in Weingartner, of assignments. A " '[p]laintiff may allege on information and belief any matters that are not within his personal knowledge, if he has information leading him to believe that the allegations are true' " (Doe v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 531, 550, italics added), and thus a pleading made on information and belief is insufficient if it "merely assert[s] the facts so alleged without alleging such information that 'lead[s] [the plaintiff] to believe that the allegations are true.' " (Id. at p. 551, fn. 5.).  Because Gomes has conceded that he has no specific information about assignments of the Note, he would not be able to plead on information and belief, based on facts leading him to believe they were true, the theories alleged in Ohlendorf and Weingartner.

For more details on how this decision affects California homeowners in financial distress, contact the Law Office of J. Arthur Roberts.

 

 

Commentary:

The attached article indicates that the overall volume of distresses properties is dropping but still amounts to $450 Billion, nearly one third of all non-governmental loans.  The Southern California area leads all metro areas.  It is estimated to take 49 months to clear the supply of distressed homes in the USA.  See the data at:

http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245286096914

 

Fourth-Quarter Shadow Inventory Update:

Drop In Liquidations, Stable Cure Rates Indicate Increased Foreclosure Timelines

by Standard & Poors 

http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245286096914

 

The volume of distressed nonagency residential mortgage properties in the U.S. continues to fall, but at an ever-slowing pace. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services currently estimates that the principal balance of these distressed homes amounts to about $450 billion, representing nearly one-third of the nonagency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market currently outstanding. We define this yet-to-be absorbed "shadow inventory" of distressed properties as outstanding properties whose borrowers are (or recently were) 90 days or more delinquent on their mortgage payments, properties currently or recently in foreclosure, or properties that are real estate owned (REO).

 

At the end of fourth-quarter 2010:

  • We estimate it will take 49 months, or more than four years, to clear the supply of distressed homes on the market in the U.S. as a whole. This is an 11% increase over the previous quarter and a considerable 40% increase from fourth-quarter 2009 for the average time to clear these properties in the U.S.
  • Miami is the only top-20 metropolitan statistical area (MSA) for which our estimate of the time to clear the inventory of distressed properties remained stable since the fourth quarter of 2009.
  • Although the Los Angeles MSA has the largest current overhang balance, the shadow inventory in the New York MSA will take the longest to clear--130 months as of fourth-quarter 2010. That is at least twice as long as it will take in any of the other top 20 MSAs and 2.7 times the average time to clear for the U.S. as a whole. This is primarily due to very low liquidation rates in New York.

 

 

 

Table 1

Shadow Inventory For The Top 20 U.S. Markets
Months of inventory at end of quarter (No.)
MSA Orig. bal outstanding (bil. $) Current overhang bal (% of bal. outstanding) 4Q10 3Q10 2Q10 1Q10 4Q09 Course of inventory levels since last quarter (%) 2010 Year-to-date course of inventory levels (%)
Atlanta 25 29.58 49 44 41 40 35 Up 13 Up 41
Boston 20.5 31.53 71 62 60 59 54 Up 14 Up 30
Charlotte 4.8 26.55 65 52 47 48 44 Up 26 Up 49
Chicago 37.2 39.55 59 52 48 45 42 Up 14 Up 41
Cleveland 4.1 34.53 57 47 43 40 36 Up 20 Up 60
Dallas 16.4 21.39 56 46 41 43 41 Up 24 Up 39
Denver 14.3 21.78 38 35 33 32 28 Up 10 Up 36
Detroit 12.1 33.72 31 30 27 25 22 Up 3 Up 43
Las Vegas 22.9 48.80 33 30 28 24 20 Up 9 Up 62
Los Angeles 173.1 31.47 50 45 43 41 36 Up 11 Up 38
Miami 57.8 56.11 60 60 64 64 60 Stable Stable
Minneapolis 13.3 28.43 38 35 32 27 21 Up 10 Up 77
New York 116.7 36.75 130 119 115 107 100 Up 9 Up 31
Phoenix 29.4 36.80 25 23 21 20 17 Up 10 Up 49
Portland 10.5 27.40 51 45 38 34 31 Up 12 Up 65
San Diego 45.8 28.38 39 35 32 31 27 Up 12 Up 43
San Francisco 77 23.26 42 38 34 32 28 Up 11 Up 53
Seattle 24.4 28.03 59 54 48 45 42 Up 10 Up 42
Tampa 15.8 47.96 57 55 55 55 51 Up 3 Up 12
Washington 60 26.47 50 44 40 37 33 Up 13 Up 52
Total U.S. market 1,358.80 33.15 49 44 41 39 35 Up 11 Up 41
MSA--Metropolitan statistical area.

Overall, the value of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) home price index indicates that home prices have fallen 20% from their heights in early 2007. Moreover, prices are likely to fall further as the distressed properties comprising the inventory are sold and the backlog clears (see chart 1).

 

 

 

Managing Director, Global Surveillance Analytics: Diane Westerback, New York 212-438-8646;
diane_westerback@standardandpoors.com
Primary Credit Analysts: Nancy Reeis, New York (1) 212-438-1643;
nancy_reeis@standardandpoors.com
Brian Grow, New York (1) 212-438-1555;
brian_d_grow@standardandpoors.com
Jacques Alcabes, New York 212-438-7438;
jacques_alcabes@standardandpoors.com
Contributors: Vidhya Venkatachalam;
CRISIL Global Analytical Centre, an S&P Affiliate, Mumbai
Madhura Karnik;
CRISIL Global Analytical Centre, an S&P Affiliate, Mumbai
Investor Relations Contacts: Ted Burbage, New York (1) 212-438-2684;
ted_burbage@standardandpoors.com
Ernestine Warner, New York (1) 212-438-2633;
ernestine_warner@standardandpoors.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commentary:  The article below describes the tip of the iceberg.  For the last year and a half, this law firm has been compiling data on CHASE, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citibank that demonstrates the lender's systematic use of fraudulant documents to facilitate relief of stay in Southern California bankruptcy proceedings as a precursor to foreclosure sales.  This legal theory has emerged as the most viable for a post bankruptcy homeowners in financial distress who want s to save their home. A class action lawsuit is being prepared.  For more information on this topic, contact the Law Office of J. Arthur Roberts.

 

 

 

Citigroup Settles Fraud Cases Tied to Texas Mortgage Assigner

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-08/citigroup-settles-as-bankrupt-homeowners-fault-use-of-mortgage-assignments.html

Citigroup Inc., the third-largest U.S. bank, settled or lost at least five claims in 2010 brought by borrowers who accused the bank of filing fraudulent mortgage documents provided by a Texas firm.

In the most recent settlement in December, a bankrupt homeowner in Wappingers Falls, New York, challenged Citigroup's use of a mortgage "assignment," which shows the transfer of ownership of a mortgage. It was signed by an employee at Orion Financial Group Inc., a Southlake, Texas, firm that provides document services to lenders.

The document was "of fraudulent nature and questionable origin," the borrower's attorney, Linda Tirelli, wrote in an August objection to the bank's claim at U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York. Citigroup created and filed the assignment after proceedings began because it otherwise couldn't prove its right to collect the debt, she wrote in an e-mail. The bank denied the allegations and didn't admit liability in the settlement.

Attorneys general in 50 states are investigating the industry's use of mortgage assignments as part of a wider probe into faulty foreclosure methods, according to Geoff Greenwood, a spokesman for Iowa attorney general Tom Miller. Last month, a Massachusetts court ruled that two foreclosures by Wells Fargo & Co. and U.S. Bancorp were invalid because assignments presented in those cases failed to prove the chain of ownership of the mortgage, sending financial stocks down.

 

Connect the Dots

Bankruptcy judges are "appropriately skeptical" when mortgage servicers claim to have assignments, said Keith Lundin, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge in Nashville, Tennessee, in an interview.

"They've got to show me more than their swearing that they have the right," he said. "They're going to have to connect up the dots back to the note and the security agreement, which would be the mortgage."

Harold Lewis, an executive with the CitiMortgage subsidiary, told Congress in November that the bank reorganized foreclosure operations last February, helping it avoid the faulty affidavit-signing practices that forced peers such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. to temporarily halt home seizures last year.

Citigroup paid almost $82,000 in opponents' legal costs when settling challenges to four bankruptcy claims that used Orion letters in 2010, according to agreements filed with federal bankruptcy courts in New York and Arkansas. The bank reduced interest rates on the remaining debt by an average of 49 percent, while cutting the outstanding mortgage balance in three cases by a combined $55,000, the filings show.

 

Raising Questions

"It doesn't strike me as something that lenders do every day of the week," said Melissa Jacoby, a bankruptcy law professor at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, referring to the size of the concessions. "It does raise some questions about the practices."

A spokesman for Citigroup, Mark Rodgers, said it doesn't comment on individual cases. The company continues to use Orion for assignment letters, he said. While borrowers have disputed the bank's use of assignments, they haven't accused Orion of wrongdoing.

"We don't create fraudulent documents," said Orion Chief Executive Officer Mike Wileman. His firm's documents show which company may hold the note and can be based on information from the bank, he said. "Sometimes the evidence is circumstantial," he wrote in an e-mail.

 

Court Records

Rodgers declined to say how often the bank relies on Orion or other outside document providers for assignments. Records aren't electronically searchable in most of the more than 3,000 counties across the U.S. In Texas's Dallas County, where documents are available online, Orion prepared at least 14 assignments transferring mortgages to Citigroup since the start of 2009, a search of records there shows.

In the Wappingers Falls case, Citigroup said it was owed about $390,000 from a mortgage on a property in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bank filed an assignment prepared by Orion to back the claim. This document claimed another lender had assigned the loan to CitiMortgage on June 24, more than three weeks after the bankruptcy began.

In settling the borrower's objections, the bank didn't admit wrongdoing. It paid Tirelli's $35,000 legal fees, reduced the mortgage principal by $29,000 and chopped the interest rate almost in half, to 3 percent.

"We reach settlements in cases for a variety of reasons, usually so both parties can avoid the expense of ongoing litigation," Rodgers, the bank spokesman, said in an e-mail.

 

Massachusetts Ruling

In Massachusetts, the state Supreme Court upheld a voiding of two 2007 foreclosures carried out by San Francisco-based Wells Fargo and Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp because the companies hadn't demonstrated that they held the mortgages at the time of the seizures. The banks had backed claims with so- called blank assignments completed after foreclosure sales.

A lender such as Citigroup may settle to avoid scrutiny of its foreclosure practices during litigation, said April Charney, a senior attorney with Jacksonville Area Legal Aid in Jacksonville, Florida, who instructs lawyers on representing consumers in foreclosure and bankruptcy cases.

"They're afraid of going through the process," she said. A risk-based analysis may focus on the question, "Do I risk going in front of the judge and getting an order that is going to beam around the whole world?" she said.

Orion is based in Southlake, Texas, a city about 30 miles northwest of Dallas. It provides "mortgage assignment, lien release and document retrieval services" to the mortgage industry, according to its website. Citigroup also uses Orion for assignments in foreclosures, Rodgers said.

 

Initial Loss

Citigroup is still facing claims tied to an Orion-prepared assignment in a case at U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Aberdeen, Mississippi. In that case, the judge disallowed the bank's initial claim to a property in Olive Branch, a city about 20 miles south of Memphis, Tennessee. The borrower later asked the court to force the bank to prove whether it has rights to the loan. Citigroup filed a response last month, fighting the borrowers' demands.

"We're going to have to go into litigation to determine who if anyone is owed the money and who if anyone still has a security interest," said William Fava, the borrower's attorney.

Citigroup has also filed Orion assignments in bankruptcy cases in states including Maryland and Georgia.

"Do they really have the right to enforce anything in this bankruptcy?" said Ryan Starks, an attorney for borrowers in Georgia, in an interview. "Or are they just clearing up the paperwork?"

 

Mortgage Business

Citigroup serviced $602 billion of mortgages in the fourth quarter of 2010 and is the fourth-largest mortgage servicer in the country, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication.

Lewis at CitiMortgage testified to Congress in November about the bank's overhaul of foreclosure practices. The company was still reviewing 10,000 affidavits that were executed before the overhaul, and about 4,000 affidavits may not have been signed before a notary and may be resubmitted, he said.

Citigroup doesn't anticipate refiling any assignments, and hasn't had to refile any prepared by Orion, said Rodgers, the spokesman.

 

To contact the reporters on this story: Donal Griffin in New York at dgriffin10@bloomberg.net; Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rick Green at rgreen18@bloomberg.net

Borrowers who executed "Pick-A-Payment"  Mortgages with Wachovia Corporation and other Wells Fargo subsidiaries now must choose between participating in the class action settlement or pursuing their own litigation.  Case No. M:09-CV-2015-JF.  https://pickapaysettlement.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=CmmRlLH9Lmw%3d&tabid=149&mid=669

 

A San Jose Federal Judge has preliminarily approved a $50Million class action settlement against Defendants World Savings, Inc., World Savings

Bank, FSB, Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, now known as Wachovia Mortgage, a

division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, Wachovia Corporation, Golden West Financial

Corporation, Wachovia Bank, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB-TX, Wachovia

Mortgage Corporation, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

("Defendants").  Up to $25 Million will be paid to the Plaintiffs' lawyers.

 

The settlement sets up a loan modification program that has questionable value and leaves the lenders in the position of deciding who gets loan mods and who doesn't.

Borrowers must be evaluated for a HAMP loan modification first.  If they do not qualify, borrower's can apply for a "

MAP2R Modification", as defined in the settlement agreement. If the borrower is ineligle for a mod, the borrower can do a short sale through the HAFA program.

 

The problem is that the loan modification process remains in the hands of the banks and are subject to the same non-transparent Net Present Value tests that are manipulated by the lenders. Potentially, borrowers who partake in the settlement will be subjected to the same loan modification nightmare that is currently playing out under HAMP.

 

The Firm suggests that borrowers consider opting out of the litigation and pursuing individual claims under the same legal theories raised in this case. 

Borrowers must "opt out" before March 11, 2011. 

Southern California Bankruptcy Law Firm | A Debt Relief Agency
Contact Attorney J. Arthur Roberts

Professional Web Design The information on this Southern Califorinia Bankruptcy Attorneys / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 3345 Newport Blvd.   Suite #213   Newport Beach CA 92663   Phone: (949) 675-9900