Law Offices of J. Arthur Roberts Free Case Evaluation Contact Us
Foreclosure Defense
Mortgage Law
Loan Modification
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Loans
Debt Negotiation
Credit Repair
Real Estate Transactions

Commentary from the frontlines:  Follow the money!  There is inherent conflict of interest between what is good for a loan servicer and what is good for the loan's owner or investor (typically a mortgage backed security trust).  Loan servicer's usually only make .25-.50 percent of the revenue that they process on behalf of an investor when a loan is performing.  However, when a loan goes into default, servicer's make a killing.  Loan servicers profit from the late fees, BPOs, foreclosure costs, attorney fees, forced placed insurance and all the other excessive fees. 

Payments received from borrowers during a trial mod or forbearance plan are put in a "suspense account".  Suspense funds earn interest for the loan servicers.  Those funds are used to pay off the accrued servicer fees first and foremost.  Generally, investors get paid after the loan servicer.  So as not to disturb the cash flow to the servicers, MBA proposes that the government make special loans to servicers so they can pay themselves and also let their investor's share in the foreclosure crisis gravy train.  The proposal would effectively double the time that servicer's can milk a property in foreclosure, in addition to the HAMP plan, and allows investor's to further delay recognizing the true losses on their books. 

Of course, as with the HAMP plan, evaluation of borrowers would be under the supervision of the loan servicers. 

the fox is watchin' the unemployed chickens too?

Proposal details:  http://www.mortgagebankers.org/files/News/InternalResource/71954_BridgetoHAMP.pdf

 

"The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) has put forth a concept for a new forbearance program that would allow borrowers who've lost their jobs to remain in their homes while they seek new employment. According to the proposed program, loan servicers would reduce the borrower's mortgage payment for up to nine months while the homeowner looks for employment."

"Under MBA's proposal, borrowers would be initially evaluated for the forbearance program using a model that assumes the borrower will be reemployed within nine months and earning 75 percent of their previous salary. The borrower would be reevaluated as to employment and income status every three months for a total forbearance of nine months. Once new employment is secured, the program would serve as a "bridge" for the borrower to be considered for a modification under the administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)."

"MBA suggests that some participating servicers would need access to special loans through Treasury so they could continue to advance payments to investors during the extended forbearance period. The trade group also noted that the program would need to be voluntary and flexible due to financial accounting considerations, in particular whether or not lenders would have to classify the forbearance as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR).  MBA created this program through a special task force of its members, and consulted with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the design. Last week, MBA representatives met with officials from the White House, the Treasury Department, and HUD to present the proposal."

"Last Friday, President Obama announced a new initiative to provide $1.5 billion to housing finance agencies in especially hard-hit states for them to develop their own loss mitigation programs, with one particular area of focus being assistance for unemployed homeowners. MBA's proposal though, puts the unemployment issue on the national stage, and although participation by servicers would be voluntary, the program would be coupled with federal HAMP efforts. Nationwide, MBA said in a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, "Over the last year, we have seen the ranks of the unemployed increase by about 5.5 million people, increasing the number of seriously delinquent loans by almost 2 million loans and increasing the rate of new foreclosures from 1.07 percent to 1.42 percent."

 
For a homeowner in financial distress, there are multiple strategies for dealing with a second mortgage:  Chapter 13 lien avoidance is one option, Chapter 7 followed by a short pay is another. Its rare that a second lien holder will foreclose.  For a borrower, playing "kick the can" is not a bad idea either.  The big banks will eventually have to shallow huge losses on this debt.
 
 
 

 

Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Treasury Department has failed to win agreements to get struggling borrowers' home- equity debt reworked, among the biggest roadblocks to reducing foreclosures that may reach a record 3 million this year.

None of the lenders holding a combined $1.05 trillion of the debt has signed contracts requiring participation in the second-mortgage modification plan announced eight months ago. The largest banks remain "committed" to joining, Meg Reilly, a department spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.

President Barack Obama in February announced a $75 billion program to cut first-mortgage payments. The Treasury detailed a plan on April 28 in which second-mortgage owners modify or retire debt when the first lien is changed, saying it would be running in a month. The near-record level of home-equity debt held by lenders including Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. may lead to foreclosures that threaten housing stability after the worst slump since the 1930s.

"The issue of the second liens has to be escalated," said Richard Neiman, New York's banking superintendent and a member of the Troubled Asset Relief Program's Congressional oversight panel. The government should consider forcing banks to participate and to recognize the "true value" of second liens, he said.

Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. carry such mortgages at about $150 billion more than their value, according to estimates by Joshua Rosner, an analyst at Graham Fisher & Co. in New York.

Equity lines and other second mortgages rank junior to typical mortgages, meaning they get wiped out in a foreclosure unless sale proceeds from a seized home exceed the first debt.

Still Struggling

As Obama's Home Affordable Modification Plan, or HAMP, lowers first-mortgage payments, some borrowers are still left with bills they can't afford, according to Newport Beach, California-based Pacific Investment Management Co.

"Modifying the first mortgage doesn't necessarily get the homeowner to good shape," Scott Simon, head of mortgage-bond investing at Pimco, manager of the world's biggest fixed-income fund, said in a telephone interview.

About 25 percent of homeowners who received trial loan modifications are failing to keep up with their reduced payments, the Treasury said Jan. 15.

Loan Modifications

Of an estimated 3.36 million U.S. homeowners with delinquent payments eligible for loan modifications under the Obama plan, 66,465 received permanent changes, according to Treasury data. That group saw its total median debt burden -- mortgage, junior liens, alimony, car payments and other bills -- reduced to 55 percent of gross income from 72 percent.

Rosner said overvalued home-equity debt prevents residents from getting the aid likeliest to keep them in their homes: principal forgiveness.

First-mortgage owners usually won't agree to the deeper principal reductions needed to reduce the loan to at or below the home's value when home-equity holders aren't willing to make sizable cuts, said John Taylor, chief executive officer of the Washington-based National Community Reinvestment Coalition.

Three million U.S. homes will be repossessed this year as high unemployment and depressed values leave borrowers unable or unwilling to make their payments or sell, RealtyTrac Inc. forecast on Jan. 14. Almost 10.7 million, or 23 percent, of residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity as of Sept. 30, according to First American CoreLogic.

Targeting Principle

Policy makers may be able to reduce re-defaults on modified debt from an average of 57 percent within a year "significantly" more by getting mortgages lowered rather than by spurring larger payment cuts, New York Federal Reserve Bank researchers wrote in a December paper.

The government is considering changes to permanently cut balances on which borrowers owe more than the property is worth, said Michael Barr, the assistant Treasury secretary for financial institutions.

"We are in the process of reviewing that now as we have been continually," Barr said on a conference call last week. "You have to be very careful not to design a program that would change people's behavior across the country."

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan "recommitted" to participating in the Treasury program this month as part of "our aggressive efforts to help customers," Rick Simon, a company spokesman, said in an e-mail.

Awaiting Final Guidelines

"We are waiting for final guidelines," Simon said.

Citigroup is "actively engaged with the U.S. Treasury in finding a workable solution," Mark Rodgers, a spokesman, said in an e-mail.

Wells Fargo is working with the government "to understand the program specifics," Mary Berg, a spokeswoman for the San Francisco-based bank, said in a phone message.

Tom Kelly, a spokesman for New York-based JPMorgan, declined to comment.

Banks' reluctance to write down second mortgages also hampers short sales, when homeowners sell a house for less than they owe, minimizing the damage to themselves, their communities and their lenders.

"If I had to name one sticking point, it's the second mortgage," said Ethan W. Gregory, an agent with First Coast Realty Associates in Jacksonville, Florida, who specializes in short sales.

'Nuisance Value'

Holders of home equity loans often hold up loan workouts to extract money from deals when their junior liens are technically worthless, said Dave Walker, chief credit officer of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, a Calabasas, California-based company managing $2.85 billion in distressed mortgage debt.

"The typical focus of a second lien investor is to extract a 'nuisance value' out of the second lien rather than rehabilitate the loan," Walker said. "If the second lien is entirely underwater, they have little or no potential recovery through liquidation of the property and their interest is wiped out at foreclosure. However, they can often demand a small payment -- $1,000 to $3,000 -- to release their lien."

Americans tapped home equity as values more than doubled between the start of 2000 and the market's apex, and took "piggyback" loans in lieu of down payments.

Home prices rose in each of the six months through October, increasing 5.3 percent, after a record 33 percent plunge from the 2006 peak, an S&P/Case-Shiller index for 20 metropolitan areas showed. Gains were driven by a decline in the share of sales involving "distressed" properties that will reverse this year as foreclosures climb, Deutsche Bank AG said Dec. 18.

The government's Home Affordable program offers subsidies to lenders, bond investors, loan servicers and consumers to rework first mortgages so that payments, insurance and taxes don't exceed 31 percent of a borrower's income.

Lender Relief

The Treasury said in April that home-equity lenders would receive a subsidy to reduce interest rates to as low as 1 percent. Lien holders could get as much as 12 cents on the dollar to retire debt. Officials said on a conference call that within about a month its program would start helping borrowers, and that as many as half of "at risk" homeowners had second mortgages.

The Treasury "has been working to create program infrastructure and technology, including a new platform that matches second liens to first liens modified under HAMP," Reilly said Jan. 7. "Because there has not been a systematic method of notification to second lien holders when a first lien on the same property is modified, ramp up has taken some time."

Fink's View

BlackRock Inc. CEO Laurence Fink, who oversees the world's largest asset manager, has called the government's effort flawed because of its treatment of second mortgages, which he said should be wiped out before first liens are touched.

"There is modification going on protecting our banks, protecting their balance sheets," Fink said in a September interview. With the right types of changes, he said, "the homeowner is better off, America is better off, and you could say the first lien holder is better off."

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. last year urged lenders to consider whether borrowers' housing debt exceeds the value of their properties and whether first mortgages have been reworked when determining loss allowances.

Bank of America's allowance for home-equity losses equaled 6.4 percent of its $152 billion portfolio as of Sept. 30, according to a slide from an earnings presentation posted on its Web site. Half the portfolio was tied to borrowers with debt exceeding 90 percent of their property's value.

TARP Approach

U.S. officials should force banks to sell their home-equity loans at current market prices of pennies on the dollar to a government-run entity, which would then forgive the debt, said Taylor, whose community-reinvestment group represents 600 organizations that work with banks on lending in low-income neighborhoods.

"When they were handing out all this TARP money, this would be a very easy conversation, but they still have the ability to do this, if they have the willingness," he said, referring to capital injections under the $700 billion TARP.

That's not a reasonable point of view because many banks can't afford to take the hits to their capital, Rosner said.

If the U.S. were to overpay for the debt, it would allow the lenders to remain solvent, he said, "but for the government to have to subsidize those writedowns, arguing it's in the best interest of the borrowers, would be merely a backdoor bailout of the banks that brought us to this crisis."

Loan Servicers

Spokespeople for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the largest owners of first-mortgage risk, declined to comment. The companies were seized by the U.S. in September 2008 and are being supported by unlimited taxpayer capital through 2012, after drawing $111 billion so far.

While Home Affordable allows loan servicers to reduce borrowers' principal instead of just their payments, such steps aren't required and decisions are designated to the servicers.

The four largest U.S. banks, which own almost $450 billion of home-equity debt, are also the biggest servicers handling payments and collections on loans held by others.

"If they can get the first to eat it, why would they want to on the second?" said Pimco's Simon, who added that his firm would support principal reductions being done on a "loan-by- loan" basis.

 

The firm is open to taking on clients who can demonstrate that they have been wrongfully denied a loan modification under the terms of the Obama administration's Home Affordable Mortgage Program or HAMP, or where the loan service has failed comply with the mandatory provisions of HAMP.

A new legal theory is emerging that may assist homeowners in receiving proper and fair consideration for a loan modification.  While you are not entitled to a loan modification, you may have the contractual right to be fairly considered pursuant to the published guidelines and directives issued by Fannie Mae and the Treasury Department. 

Understand the context of this emerging legal theory.  Over the last year, most loan servicers have entered into a contract with Fannie Mae as the agent for the U.S. Treasury department.  An actual contract sample is attached: http://www.consumerlaw.org/issues/financial_distress/content/loan_modification/RGMortgageCorporation.pdf

The contract's terms includes the published guidelines and directives published by the government.  Some of the guidelines are discretionary and some are mandatory.   The legal question is:  did the government and the loan servicers intend that borrowers are the "intended" beneficiaries to the contract?  If so, such a third party beneficiary can sue to enforce the performance of the contract.  

To date, I know of three federal cases moving this theory through the courts.  All three have faced motions to dismiss by loan servicers.  One motion succeeded, one failed and the third, a class action suit, is pending. 

Under the right facts, with the right judge...the theory should work to get a consumer a fair chance at a loan mod.  These days, good faith consideration for loan modification is the exception, and not the rule.          

 

 

Southern California Bankruptcy Law Firm | A Debt Relief Agency
Contact Attorney J. Arthur Roberts

Professional Web Design The information on this Southern Califorinia Bankruptcy Attorneys / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 3345 Newport Blvd.   Suite #213   Newport Beach CA 92663   Phone: (949) 675-9900